COGNIFAI Illustrative sample · Fictional firm and data
Call review report · Claims Management

100 calls reviewed. 34 passed every check.

A review of 100 intake and sign-up calls from an example claims management phone team, scored against FCA CMCOB rules and the Consumer Duty, with the moments that matter quoted and timestamped.

Firm Example Claims LtdCalls 100Advisers 8Period 1 to 30 Sep 2026Prepared 7 Oct 2026

01Summary

Fair-call rate
34%
Calls passing every applicable check
Cases signed
41
of 100 calls
Vulnerability
5 of 11
disclosures not responded to
Pressure flags
8
calls, across 3 advisers

What's working

  • Pressure and misleading statements are rare and concentrated in three advisers, not the whole floor.
  • Your two best compliant advisers sign more cases than the floor average, not fewer.
  • Almost every customer expected the call.

What needs fixing first

  • The third-party payments statement is missed on 29 calls.
  • Fees are explained clearly on only two in three signed cases.
  • Five vulnerable customers were taken through sign-up without any adjustment.

02Scorecard by requirement

Each check is tested on the calls where it applies. Written disclosures are outside this review; we test what was said on the call.

What we checkRequirementAppliedPass rate
Third-party payments statement at the start of the callCMCOB 2.2.8R100
71%
Told they can claim for free without a CMC, where a free route existsCMCOB 2.2.8R38
55%
Fees explained clearly, with an exampleCMCOB 4.2.5R41
66%
14-day cancellation right explainedCMCOB 2.1.12R41
73%
No high-pressure sellingCMCOB 2.1.4R100
92%
Fair, clear, not misleading. No unproven promises about outcome or speedCMCOB 3.2.1R, 3.2.6R100
95%
Vulnerability recognised and responded toCMCOB 2.1.2R · Consumer Duty11
55%
Customer understanding checked before sign-upConsumer Duty41
54%
Customer expected the contactPECR reg. 21A100
96%

03The moments that matter

Every flag links back to the exact moment in the call, so your team can listen and decide. We flag; people decide.

Call C-0417Adviser 06At 00:09:42Pressure
If we don't get this signed today the window closes, so let's just do it now.

Why it matters: the customer asked for time to think at 00:08:55. There is no deadline on this claim. Likely high-pressure selling under CMCOB 2.1.4R.

Call C-0233Adviser 03At 00:04:18Fees
Honestly, it won't cost you a penny either way.

Why it matters: the agreement carries a success fee. The fee was never explained on the call, and the statement is misleading if the claim succeeds (CMCOB 3.2.1R, 4.2.5R).

Call C-0388Adviser 06At 00:12:05Vulnerability
Since the accident I've been on medication and I'm struggling to take things in.

Why it matters: the adviser carried on to sign-up without checking understanding, slowing down or offering to send details and call back (CMCOB 2.1.2R, Consumer Duty).

Call C-0151Adviser 02At 00:06:30Best practice
Before we go any further, I want to be clear about what we charge and what you'd keep if the claim succeeds.

Why it matters: fees explained before outcome was discussed. The customer asked two questions, understood the answers and signed. This is the line to coach.

04Compliant sales: what your best advisers do

Being fair didn't cost sales. On these calls the advisers who did it properly signed more.

Fees explained early
46%
signed, vs 35% when not
Understanding checked
48%
signed, vs 33% when not
Top 2 fair advisers
52%
sign rate, floor average 41%
Pressure calls
2 of 8
ended in a signed case

Behaviours to make standard

  • Explain the fee before talking about what the claim might be worth.
  • Ask how the accident has affected them, in their words, in the first three minutes.
  • Recap and confirm understanding before asking for sign-up.
  • When a customer hesitates, offer to send the details and book a callback.

Coaching priorities

  • Adviser 06: pressure and vulnerability handling. Listen to C-0417 and C-0388 together.
  • Advisers 03 and 07: fee explanations.
  • Whole floor: the third-party payments statement in the opening.
About this sample. 100 calls is enough to show you what the analysis looks like, not enough to draw firm conclusions about a whole phone team. At scale we review every call, every month. This report is illustrative: the firm, advisers, calls and figures are fictional. Rule references are a guide for your compliance team and are not legal advice.
COGNIFAI · CALL REVIEW REPORTILLUSTRATIVE · NOT A REAL CLIENT